Hi, users-return-1912-ullrich.jans=elektrobit....@subversion.apach e.org wrote: > Subject: RE: svnadmin create not honoring sticky bit > > Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:16:50PM +0200, >> ullrich.j...@elektrobit.com wrote: > >>> ls -l test1/db/rep-cache.db test2/db/rep-cache.db >>> -rw-r-----+ 1 root www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 >>> test1/db/rep-cache.db >>> -rw-r-----+ 1 username users 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 >>> test2/db/rep-cache.db >> >> See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3437 > > I know about that one. (That's why I mentioned it in my original mail) > > What's new (to me) is the permissions on *all* the files in > db (just one example from db to keep the email short): > > drwxrws---+ 3 root www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 test1/db/revs > drwxrwx---+ 3 username users 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 test2/db/revs > > Looking at the main directory shows that the sticky bit on db > got dropped: > > ls -l test2 > total 48 > drwxrws---+ 2 username www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 conf > drwxrwx---+ 6 username www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 db > ^here > -r--r-----+ 1 username www 2 2010-03-30 14:07 format > drwxrws---+ 2 username www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 hooks > drwxrws---+ 2 username www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 locks > -rw-rw----+ 1 username www 229 2010-03-30 14:07 README.txt > > Occurred on svn 1.6.9 (package from the Suse Buildservice): > > subversion-1.6.9-4.3 > subversion-perl-1.6.9-4.3 > subversion-tools-1.6.9-4.3 > subversion-server-1.6.9-4.3
Any ideas on that one? Should I open an issue in the tracker? Cheers, Ulli ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, please do not disclose it to anyone, notify the sender promptly, and delete the message from your system. Thank you.
