svn merge [source svn location] -c 444,469,480

> -----Original Message-----
> From: emerson [mailto:echofloripa.y...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: 05 July 2010 17:38
> To: Andy Levy; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Applying multiple commits done to a branch to 
> another branch
> 
> Hi
> 
> I was told that I could use the following syntax to merge 
> different revisions at once:
> 
> svn merge [source svn location] -c 444 -c 469 -c 480
> 
> However, when I tried using this syntax I found out that all 
> merges are done against the initial state of the current 
> folder which resulted in conflicts, as in some cases the 
> differents commits were related to the same bit of code.
> 
> Is there anyway to have in one command line a behaviour that 
> would take in account the previous revisions?
> 
> thanks
> Emerson
> 
> On 17 June 2010 14:53, emerson <echofloripa.y...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 17 June 2010 13:29, Andy Levy <andy.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:38, emerson 
> <echofloripa.y...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi Guys
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the answers.
> >>> First Andy, yes, we put more than the story code on the 
> commits :) 
> >>> We are using svn 1.4.4 ont he server, so to be able to 
> keep track of 
> >>> the ancestors logs we will probably need to upgrade.
> >>
> >> Note that the 1.4 series has not been supported for quite 
> some time, 
> >> and when 1.7 is released, 1.5 support will be dropped. You 
> definitely 
> >> ought to upgrade.
> >>
> >
> > We are going to move to the latest stable 1.6.11.
> >
> >>> Still, I believe we need some tool to search the logs for that 
> >>> especific #xxxx code of the story.
> >>> Correct me if I am wrong, but from there I would have to 
> collect all 
> >>> the revision numbers, and apply them in a single merge 
> manually? Is 
> >>> there any way to automate this?
> >>
> >> If each story gets its own branch, then you don't have to 
> worry about that.
> >
> > We might in the future go for a bigger isolation level like 
> this, but 
> > at this point we will work with two different branches, a unstable 
> > (which would be our current trunk) and a stable, which will get 
> > promoted a story at a time.
> >
> > We needed something like this:
> >
> > Ex: searchsvnapp http://[repo location root] #s1322
> >
> > result:
> > revisions: 4233,4249,4313
> >
> > This would then be copied and pasted in a merge command that would 
> > allow to apply all the revisions at once.
> >
> > I know that tortoise can do that, how can that be done on 
> the command 
> > line? Or through some API maybe?
> >
> > BTW, Is there any way to use the merge command to apply several 
> > revisions at once?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Emerson
> >
> >>> On 16 June 2010 22:40, Daniel Becroft 
> <djcbecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Bob Archer 
> <bob.arc...@amsi.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> You're describing a normal usage of merging.
> >>>>>> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You don't want to redo all those commit messages, you want the 
> >>>>>> merge to be aware of the history behind everything that's been 
> >>>>>> done (which, if you're using 1.5 or later, is taken 
> care of), so 
> >>>>>> that svn log can trace back & all those messages fall 
> right in line.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Really... I didn't know this happened. If you look at 
> the log of trunk where you have merged in from branch won't 
> it only show the merge as a single rev with the message you 
> made in the merge commit. How will you be able to trace the 
> log back through the changes made in branch?
> >>>>
> >>>> It does, but not by default. You need to use the 
> >>>> '-g/--use-merge-history' switch.
> >>>>
> >>>> 
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.advanced.htm
> >>>> l#svn.branchmerge.advanced.logblame
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Daniel B.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit 
> http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 

Reply via email to