Thank you for your concern, will try that also. 

Sorry for delay in replies. 

Best regards,

 

Kayhan YÜKSEL

FASDAT GIDA A.Ş.

IT Department

Software Developer

 

 

From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 5:34 PM
To: Kayhan Yüksel; users@subversion.apache.org
Cc: İsmail Hakkı ŞAHİN
Subject: RE: subversion configuration problem

 

                Hi,

 

The SlikSVN distribution is Ipv6 enabled. If you don't tell the svnserve binary 
on which address it should listen, it defaults to listening on IPv6.

(For clients this is the behavior you want and for servers this might currently 
be unexpected, but it is probably what you want in a few years once the 
internet switched to IPv6)

 

You can override this behavior by adding --listen-host 192.168.0.1 to the 
svnserve commandline, where 192.168.0.1 is the address that you want to use for 
your svnserve daemon. You can specify 0.0.0.0 to listen on all IPv4 addresses 
or ::0 to listen on all IPv6 addresses.

 

                Bert

 

From: Kayhan Yüksel [mailto:kayh...@fasdat.com.tr] 
Sent: woensdag 15 september 2010 14:09
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Cc: İsmail Hakkı ŞAHİN
Subject: subversion configuration problem

 

To whom it may respond to,

 

We have been required to setup a svn server without using Apache Server on a 
Windows 2008 Server. After installing SlikSVN , we have created a test 
repository using svnadmin at c:\svn\repos  and started SVNSERVE as deamon. As  
a client, we are testing AnkhSVN inside VS 2010 , but couldn't connect using 
svn://machinename/svn/repos , after opening the svn folder to sharing, we have 
been able to reach via file://machinename/svn/repos 
<file:///\\machinename\svn\repos>  , but this is not a good method to live 
with. How can we setup slikSVN + AnkhSVN to use svn protocol for communications 
?

 

Thank you for your concern,

 

Best Regards,

 

Kayhan YÜKSEL

FASDAT GIDA A.Ş.

IT Department

Software Developer

 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5452 (20100915) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5452 (20100915) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Reply via email to