Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 08:41:51 -0400: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Alan Barrett <a...@cequrux.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> > What he really wants is an alternate-universe Subversion which never > >> > had the plaintext password storage feature in the first place. > >> > >> I'd settle for being able to block that local use on the server side: > > > > OK, so you want a feature in which the client reports to the server > > "here are some important aspects of my configuration", and the server > > replies "I don't like <this> aspect of your configuration, so I refuse > > to work with you". I suggest that you write up a proposal for such a > > feature, or begin a focused discussion about how such a feature could > > work and could be useful. > > I think the gpg-agent support will provide that by forcing people to a > new authentication protocol. Won't that work?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/121768
