Stefan Sperling wrote: > > Can two svnserves share one repository? > > Yes. You can run as many server instances as you like, also with > different access methods (e.g. http:// and svn:// at the same time).
I have read that different access methods can be used simultaneously. I did not know it was possible for several svnserve processes to access the same repository. That's great news. I think it solves my problem, I will just setup another svnserve process for anonymous users listening on a different TCP port, with a special --config-file. But wait. How do I setup per repository authz-db together with a global svnserve.conf? My svnserve serves several repositories. > > > There will be no data corruption, will there? > > In general, no. There are some multi-access problems with BDB-based > repositories running into issues with berkeleyDB where you might have I use FSFS. In fact, I have hated BDB for many years since I ran slapd and especially spamprobe with the BDB backend. > to unwedge repositories using svnadmin recover: > http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#stuck-bdb-repos > > However, these days FSFS-based repositories are the default and > they don't have that issue. Do they have some locking mechanism? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru
