On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:30:06 +0000, Geoff Hoffman wrote: ... > To clarify what I meant - say you have Repo-A/Path-B and Repo-X/Path-Y. You > could cd into your working copy of Path-B and do svn checkout Repo-X/Path-Y > Y and end up with B/Y in your working copy such that changes under Y commit > to Repo-X and changes under B not under Y commit to Repo-A. I have a hunch > this (not throwing an error) is by design, because it is *almost* identical > to how svn:externals work. I just tested this and Y shows up as ? when > doing svn status under B.
I didn't test that, but I suppose that Y is not known to the 'outer' svn sandbox, and changes in the 'inner sandbox (Y) wouldn't be committed or shown in 'svn status'. Can you 'svn switch' a subtree to a different repo? And what happens then on a commit? :-) Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800