On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:30:58AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Note that this is also one of the cases where the selection of the >> Apache license for Subversion, rather than GPL, means that Wandisco >> can build a business plan on selling these commercially enhanced >> versions of Subversion without ever publishing the code..... > > AFAIK they don't modify Subversion's code. Their solution proxys webdav > traffic between Subversion clients and servers, like a man-in-the-middle. > The licence of Subversion doesn't matter in this case.
I'd be..... really, really surprised by that. I'd expect the pre-commit hooks, at least, to do some kind of verification of the local server's state as the designated master node, to avoid the split-brain situations. But since it's closed source, I don't have access to it. Do you have a copy you can check on?