On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:54:46PM +0100, Hutchinson, Steve (UK) wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > We have been looking at git-svn but to be honest I was hoping for a cleaner > svn solution if there was one. >
It is a planned feature, but nobody is actitively working on it at the moment. See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3626 In the meantime, you'll have to use a third party solution. git-svn has already been mentioned, but there are alternatives. You could also create a temporary Mercurial repository in the SVN working copy. Mercurial has a 'patch queue' feature which stores your local commits as a series of patches. This makes it easy to re-apply your local commits to a Subversion a working copy later and commit them to SVN in order. See http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/managing-change-with-mercurial-queues.html
