Philip Martin wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 18:45:37 +0000: > Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > > > If I use the debugger to manually set target->node_revision to NULL > > inside svn_fs_fs__dag_increment_mergeinfo_count then the commit works. > > I'm not exactly sure how all the FSFS caching layers are supposed to > > interact. Is tree.c:update_ancestry supposed to update the in-memory > > predecessor_count? Should there be a svn_fs_fs__dag_xxx function to > > change the predecessor count? Should target->node_revision be set to > > NULL soemwehere? Something else? > > Moving update_ancestry from tree.c to dag.c is one way to fix the > problem. Daniel also suggested removing the node_revision member of > dag_node_t altogether and relying on new 1.7 caching to give us the > performance. I suppose we would still need a patch like this for 1.6. >
++1
