Jason Wong wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 15:34:53 -0700: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote: > > Jason Wong wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 13:41:19 -0700: > >> Hello Daniel, Philip. > >> > >> I have been following the thread: "#4129 is reproducible Re: > >> predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message". > >> It looks like you all have it figured out now. Good job. > >> > >> Do you need any more information from me at this point? Thanks. > >> > > > > Thanks Jason. It would be useful if you could confirm that you do not > > run into the error after rebuilding the server with r1302399 and > > r1302613 applied. (If you run the test suite, apply r1302539 and > > r1302591 too.) These revisions constitute the fix which is nominated > > for inclusion in 1.6.18 and 1.7.5; see ^/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS. > > > > Hi Daniel. > > The developer who built the svn client is away and will probably not be back > until later this week. What is your ETA for 1.7.5? Just wondering if that > would > released before the developer I have is back. >
The time until 1.7.5 is counted in weeks, and 1.6.18 is scheduled to be released next week. > Thanks. > > Jason > > > Cheers, > > > > Daniel > > > >> Jason Wong.