Hi, Martin,

> Von: Philip Martin
> Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> writes:
> > [Missing or broken pristines]
> > Is this a situation from which svn could ultimately become self-healing?
> 
> I suppose it might get fixed as a side-effect of somebody implementing
> "optional pristine" but generally wq items are not supposed to fail.

I'd see it the other way: Having a working "fetch missing pristines" 
implementation is a precondition (and not a side-effect) of things like 
"optional pristines" and "shared pristine storage".

It is needed to return whatever working copy into the "old" self-contained 
state. If that functionality is not provided from the beginning, existing users 
will be _very_ alienated.

Best regards

Markus Schaber
-- 
___________________________
We software Automation.

3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Developer
Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 | Fax 
+49-831-54031-50

Email: m.scha...@3s-software.com | Web: http://www.3s-software.com 
CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com
Download CoDeSys sample projects: 
http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects

Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade 
register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915 

Reply via email to