Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:26:04 +0000: > Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes: > > > Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:59:47 -0600: > >> But, the copy built by svnsync doesn't necessarily > >> get stored the same way, does it? > > > > I think in 1.8/fsfs it will byte-for-byte identical. (except > > rep-cache.db, but you can remove that file without consequences) > > > > There was a dev@ thread by philipm about this not too long ago. > > No, an svnsync mirror is usually not identical to the master. It does > contain the same versioned data but the representation of that data is > different. For example, every failed commit on the master will bump the > fsfs sequence number and that will cause the node-revision-ids to be > different.
Node-revision-id's in revisions don't embed transaction id's... For example the noderev header (yes, header, not just id) of /subversion/trunk/notes is identical between svn.us and svn.eu.
