Marius Gedminas wrote on Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:28:22 +0200: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 08:32:35PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote: > > Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> writes: > > > > > It is possible that authz rules prohibit access to the path affected > > > by the revision. In which case svnsync would silently omit that path. > > > > $ svn log -vqr129027 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > r129027 | (no author) | (no date) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > That looks like a revision filtered by authz. > > I guess I'll have to patch svn-all-fast-export not to segfault when it > encounters such empty revisions. (Unfortunately attempting to exclude > them by revision number is not enough.) >
+1. In general you cannot assume that any revprops will be present, that any paths will have been changed, or that any path recorded as changed has a different text or properties hash before v. after the revision. > Marius Gedminas > -- > I never got into Linux. I swear to God, it's only lack of time. I'm past the > years of my life where I can really dig into something like running a Linux > system. I'm very sympathetic to the whole idea; Linux people always think the > way I want to think. > -- Steve Wozniak
