On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:37:24PM +1000, Daniel Becroft wrote: > Hi, > > When running an 'svn merge -c', I get a particular set of paths updated > with svn:mergeinfo. Fine, no issues with this. > > However, when running an 'svn merge -c --record-only', I get a far greater > set of paths *reported* as updated, but they actually aren't. The paths > that are report actually do have their own 'svn:mergeinfo' properties, but > they don't get changes by the merge command (which I expected). > > I think the paths either need to be updated, or not displays. > > Using: svn 1.7.7
This is a known issue. The new behaviour described at http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#subtree-mergeinfo-recording wasn't implemented for record-only merges. Record-only merges still update all subtree mergeinfo within the merge target. I don't know why record-only merges behave differently, and I've tried but cannot find a reference that explains this. Perhaps the new behaviour is too difficult to implement for record-only merges, or maybe this difference exists on purpose.
