Guten Tag Zé, am Samstag, 11. Mai 2013 um 23:26 schrieben Sie: > That's not exactly a development branch, but a directory tree.
That's simply a matter of taste and what I said for customer/server related hierarchies of tags fits perfectly well for branches which develop towards e.g. one bigger feature. > Tags/branches aren't directories which need to be organized in a deep > hierarchical structure. That's your opinion but as you said before it's "not the point". The point is that git is not capable of doing things the way I like and Subversion not the way that you like. > Wit Git, when a branch is created it is expected to have a finite > lifespan, which is supposed to end either by being merged with the trunk > or being deleted, without leaving any trace on the versioning history. And what about tags for nightly builds etc.? > A tag is nothing but a pointer to a particular point in the repo's history. Which ignores the important thing that the user should be able to organize those points the way he likes. Or what's exactly what you are criticizing on Subversion? Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow