On 24.10.2013 14:08, Attila Nagy wrote: > On 10/22/13 09:56, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 22.10.2013 07:13, Branko ?ibej wrote: >>> On 21.10.2013 18:16, Attila Nagy wrote: >>>> On 10/15/2013 08:09 AM, Attila Nagy wrote: >>>>> I store OS images in svn, so I need to record file permissions and >>>>> ownership. For this, I use properties. >>>>> But svn changes real file permissions: >>>> OK, long story short. Isn't this a security issue? >>> No, because Subversion does not promise to restore original file >>> permissions, and therefore you shouldn't rely on it to do so. >>> >>> There used to be a Unix-specific patch for storing and restoring the >>> permissions bits, but it does not appear to be mantained. > As Thorsten has pointed out, this is a different case. BTW, I have a > similar solution, like contrib/asvn, but the current operation of svn > makes it impossible/very hard to make it work, because it screws up > real file permissions on each commits.
Yes, that's a valid point. Subversion will possibly write the file and/or change permissions on commit in two cases, I think: * The file has the svn:needs-lock property set, and has to be made read-only after commit; or, * The file contains keywords, which have to be updated (e.g., author and revision change after a commit). -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com