On 26.11.2013 18:27, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 26.11.2013 18:08, Philip Martin wrote: >> Marc Strapetz <marc.strap...@syntevo.com> writes: >> >>> We are encountering working copies with >>> >>> nodes.presence = moved and nodes.moved_to = <null> >> What does "nodes.presence = moved" mean? There has never been a moved >> presence. >> >> Do you mean rows with nodes.moved_here=1 no corresponding rows with >> non-null nodes.moved_to? Or something else? >> >>> As far as I have been told, this has already been fixed and backported >>> to 1.8.5. Still, for those users which already have this corruption, is >>> there a way to recover their working copies with standard Subversion >>> functionality? Could a Revert work? And if it currently does not, could >>> the Revert be more tolerant, so it could handle such cases? >> What operation is failing? Are you getting some error? > > Marc is looking at some code that converts wc.db info to some internal > structure ... > > Marc, can you please explain how the wc.db itself looks like? Hint: we > don't support SmartSVN or SVNKit here. :)
FWIW, I've been promised a reproduction script using the command-line. Hope it'll be ready soon. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
