Hi, I was wondering whether "-r REV SRC" and "SRC@REV" in "svn copy" are supposed to behave differently or not.
I was trying to recover a file that has already been deleted from the repository, but using "-r" syntax failed to work while @REV completed successfully: > svn copy -r 10 ^/trunk/path/to/my/file.txt . svn: E160013: '/repository/name/!svn/bc/25/trunk/path/to/my/file.txt' path not found > svn copy ^/trunk/path/to/my/file.txt@10 . A /here/file.txt On the other hand, if the file still exists, the "-r REV" syntax works just fine and copies the old file (revision 10 in the above example). Is this expected? I'm using SVN 1.8.5 (and also tried with the trunk version which behaves the same), while the server uses SVN 1.6.11. Mojca (PS: If necessary I can provide real URLs.)
