On 2/1/14, 1:24 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> I wasn't criticizing anything. Just thought that expanding $FreeBSD$
> may have been a feature the FreeBSD guys patched into Subversion on
> their own, because some days ago it has been mentioned that FreeBSD
> patches subversion to get some features they need. If that is the
> case the questioner would need more than just svndump expanding
> keywords, because it would likely not support anything else than what 
> svn clients do now. It was just a hint coming into my mind reading
> about the problem, no need to overestimate.

Sorry, I thought you realized they'd added it because the link you provided
documented how to use custom keywords.

Reply via email to