Thanks for confirming that Bert. I'd prefer to keep the trunk stable so I've recommended the reverse merge approach.
From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] Sent: 25 February 2014 10:38 To: James French; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: separating out unwanted changes That is one option. The other option is creating a maintenance branch from the old revision, where things were still ok (e.g. right before the reintegrate) and then merging the changes from trunk to the branch that you want to keep. It really depends on whether you want to have 'trunk' to be stable again, or if you just want to have access a stable branch while still allowing (unstable) development work on trunk. Bert From: James French [mailto:james.fre...@naturalmotion.com] Sent: dinsdag 25 februari 2014 10:51 To: users@subversion.apache.org<mailto:users@subversion.apache.org> Subject: separating out unwanted changes Hi, I wonder if someone could give me some advice on the following situation. Its probably pretty simple but my svn knowledge has dropped off a bit. An unstable dev branch was reintegrated and then a bunch of subsequent fixes were made on the mainline, mixed in with other development. Stability has still not been achieved and its now desirable to rollback all the fixes and the dev branch and carry on working on the fixes on another dev branch while normal development carries on as usual. I'm thinking, rollback all the bug fix commits and the branch reintegration and get that committed. Then create a dev branch and then reverse merge the reverted commit onto it? Sound right? Cheers, James
