Stefan Hett wrote on Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 19:03:08 +0200: > It does and that's not quite the problem for me. However what's > possible to do with SVN are merges like these: > > merge A/B/somefile into A
That surprises me. We have a similar validation for 'switch' that enforces the source and target are related (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848); shouldn't we have something similar for 'merge'? Cheers, Daniel > absolutely valid operation, but nothing we use here. In cases this > is done here in our company it's always an incorrect merge (because > someone chose the wrong destination folder. > So we want to prevent issues like these, because they can easily > result in polluting the mergeinfo records.
