> > Code review is the main one, but this is driven by github.com more than > git itself, I guess. >
That was the game changer <https://trunkbaseddevelopment.com/game-changers/#github-s-entire-platform-2008-onwards> wasn't it. Github's platform had built in code-review with the pull request concept from their public launch (2008). That raised the bar, and all portals had to have built in code review after that. Of course Google had this first with their Mondrian code review system (2006 if not before), but that wasn't available to use mortals. Anecdotally GitHub implement their code review in Postgres. I'd prefer to see it backed by source control, which I touch on 2/3 of the way through this <https://paulhammant.com/2014/11/13/code-review-the-unit-of-work-should-be-a-single-commit/> article. - Paul
