Op 25 jul. 2017 9:48 a.m. schreef "Andreas Krey" <a.k...@gmx.de>:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:38:38 +0000, Nathan Hartman wrote: ... > Subversion is a very good system. It doesn't get the credit it deserves, Please. git managed to be faster in providing actually working (i.e. tracked) merges than subversion, and then there was the --reintegrate debacle that took another five years to sort out. Please. svn managed to be faster in providing granular access control, sparse checkouts, handling large repositories and is *vastly* more simple to use than git. It even has internal libraries with stable API's that allow writing plugins and GUI's on top rather than them having to drive a command line utility. So ... it depends what you're after. git being faster at having tracked merges doesn't make Subversion a bad system. -- Johan
