On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:46:36 +0100, Branko ?ibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>Also, as a matter of best practice: with Subversion, it's generally >better to use one large repository than a number of small ones. And >instead of trying to replicate the structure you used with CVS, you >should think about structuring your data so that it fits Subversion's >model better. It takes a bit of getting used to but is definitely worth >it in the long run. > The reason we have CVS divided into several repositories is that we use it for different departments to version all kinds of files. Security mandades that we keep these isolated from each other. Also if one has a monolitic respository there will be such a huge amount of directories at the top level.... When moving to svn I have split one of the repositories in two to separate code accessed by consultants from code and other sensitve files only for our own employees. -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden
