On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:56 AM Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:10 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 6:31 PM Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > > Given that history will be lost, does anyone see any problems with my > > > recovery plan? > ... > > If you have working copies and you don't care about history, why are > > you spending any cycles on doing anything with hotcopy? You've lost > > history anyway, why keep any of it? > > Cycles aren't important, but the size of the data is. Transferring the > working copy from scratch would take a LONG time, while the bulk of > the data are already there in the hotcopy.
Under what possible conditions wound importing a single snapshot of the current working copy, without history, take more time than working from a hotcopy to overlay the changes on top of that hotcopy? > So, again, would my plan work to re-establish my repo and work flow? Yes, any of your solutions could work. > Thanks. > > -Tom
