On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:50:00AM +0100, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag Stefan Sperling, > am Montag, 24. Februar 2020 um 21:04 schrieben Sie: > > > If several possible move targets exist, the 'svn' client will offer > > 'd' and 'w' conflict options which may help you to set the right > > destination paths. > > It did, thanks. That's what I had expected from TSVN as well. But do > you really mean "w" or "m"? Because I have been offered "d" and "m" > only: > > > Select: (p) Postpone, (r) Mark as resolved, > > (m) Apply to move destination, > > (d) Set repository move destination path, (h) Help, > > (q) Quit resolution: d > > Just wondering if "w" is something I need to keep in mind > additionally.
It depends on the particular situation. "w" only happens in case there is more than one possible move target inside the working copy, which also depends on the particular repository-side path selected with "d". If the path selected with "d" maps to a single path in the working copy then "w" is not needed. > > This feature only works if the SVN client implements support for it. > > If TSVN did not do that, then they are missing this feature. > > I am not sure how far TortoiseSVN went with their resolver implementation. > > Am going to ask them, mabye I simply did something wrong or missed > some setting or else. Thanks! Perhaps this is indeed just missing in their UI.