Hi Stefan, Thanks for the quick reply. Although I'd be happy to update the docs, truth is, I'm not qualified. I find I am often required to use GIT although I have a very strong preference for SVN. Not having any current documentation makes my arguments for subversion weaker.
Might I suggest a community, coordinated, and managed effort to update the docs? Thanks. Blake McBride On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:51 PM Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:13:26PM -0500, Blake McBride wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I am a long time user and lover of svn. It seems like the main > > documentation for SVN is for version 1.7 yet svn is now at 1.14. Since > the > > version hasn't gotten to 2.x, I presume that the changes are not overly > > significant. So, is there better documentation, or are there plans to > > update the red-bean version? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Blake McBride > > Hi Blake, > > The best source of information about what changed since 1.7 are > release notes: https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/ > > It would be great if the book were expanded to reflect changes that > appeared after 1.7. Contributions to the book are welcome. See the > section "Feeback/Contributing" on http://svnbook.red-bean.com/ > > Regards, > Stefan >
