We agree ;) But there may be a good reason behind these .page. Does anyone know ?
Thanks in advance ZedroS On 5/16/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes,IMO it would be better if those files were called *.jwc.xml and *.page.xml in this case IDEs would not need additional configuration to recognize the files. Hibernate uses the approach with hbm.xml and it works wery well. Konstantin Ignatyev PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth, humans will add fifteen million tons of carbon to the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of tropical rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert, eliminate between forty to one hundred species, erode seventy-one million tons of topsoil, add 2,700 tons of CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their population by 263,000 Bowers, C.A. The Culture of Denial: Why the Environmental Movement Needs a Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools. New York: State University of New York Press, 1997: (4) (5) (p.206) ----- Original Message ---- From: ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:22:52 PM Subject: Why .page and not .xml for the template ? Hi all Just a question which popped up recently in my mind : why are the templates pages named .page and not .xml ? It's not like another .xml would have annoyed anyone, is it ? On the other hand, .xml files would be automatically detected and dealed accordingly but all tools, whereas .page are less well known... Do you have any idea on the topic ? Thanks in advance ZedroS
