re: "since Spring does not have explicit Tapestry-support" Is it up to spring add tapestry support? No. Its is up to Tapestry to fix it brokenness?
Webwork is not mentioned in spring's lib/src, yet its spring support is superior. Right now tapestry's spring support is kind of half baked. Pages cannot be autowired from spring. In addition, I don't think its possible today to do "prototype" proxy-ing of Tapestry pages/actions via auto-proxy or explicitly, since spring cannot create the abstract tapestry pages. We will have to wait for the framework to become more pojo based. For now, I believe recommendation "explicitly" inject your singleton services. All the advice would be specified on the service. If you don't want your services to be singletons, I am not sure if all that lifecycle handling is complete yet. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 3:28 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Tapernate and Spring Hi all, In a recent different thread, the question about "Why use Tapernate if you use Spring" had come up as a side-question. It seems that some (Hibernate-related) features of Tapernate are alternatives to equivalent Spring features, while others are more Tapestry-related features (e.g. the DataSqueezer) that are not available in Spring, since Spring does not have explicit Tapestry-support. For some of the features listed on the feature-list at http://www.carmanconsulting.com/tapernate/ I am not sure which category they belong to: - Is there anything in Spring that deals with the reattachment-strategies ("Persistence Strategies" on the list)? - Is the "POJO-Rollback" functionality covered by Spring's Transaction facility? Does anybody know if there is a document with a comparison of the various frameworks/add-on libs that offer persistence-support (Tapernate, Hivetranse, Honeycomb, [Spring]; are there more?) for Tapestry? Like a quick features and pros/cons comparison? Thanks, MARK P.S. James, did you forget to list the transaction-strategies on the feature list, or did you leave it out intentionally? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy or delete the original message. Also, please be aware that if you are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action or reliance based on this message is prohibited by law. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
