I wish picking a new logo could be done a bit more logically along the lines a commercial product would be chosen, before actually voting on the change. Coming up with a good logo can take quite a while and rightly so.
I see two possible approches: 1) Make a description of the values & direction of the framework and the community in 2-4 sentences. or 2) Define the primary sort of people you want to appeal to. By this I don't mean to say that Tapestry doesn't have a broad appeal, but that tapestry has distinguishing features which appeals to certain groups more so than other frameworks do. Once you have a sort of consensus on that it is much easier to make suggestions on a logo and much easier to argue merrits of one or the other. The must be a couple of professional graphic artists out there that love Tapestry, and can come up with some top notch suggestions. To open it up: "Tapestry allows you to make and maintain highly interactive web sites/applications with no or very little knowledge of Java/J2EE. ..." I thing Web Designers with strong html/css skills but little server side skills are a group that Tapestry can appeal to more so than most other solutions. Henrik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
