Duh! Yes, as you guys guessed, I meant Hivemind not Hibernate. I think I
need to hibernate a little more and get my mind back ...
Thanks for your input ...
----- Original Message -----
From: "kranga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 8:05 PM
Subject: Tapestry 3 to 4.1 to 5
We have a very large financial services applicaiton built with Tapestry 3
and it meets all the requirements for the project. But in looking ahead, I
am trying to get some data to guide technology decisions for the project.
My questions are:
- Hibernate is used extensively in 4.x and though the principal is that
you don't need to worry about Hibernate, the emails on this list make it
look like a lot of deviations from defaults require Hibernate. Does anyone
know if Hibernate is used outside of Tapestry? Specifically how is its
user-base size and popularity when compared with Spring?
- I've heard that 5 is not going to be backward compatible with 3. So that
would give me absolutely no reason to upgrade to 4.x anytime soon. Is the
4.x to 5 incompatibility true? If so, it also seems like Tapestry is
negatively skewed from a "business" perspective - high barrier to adopt
the framework (the learning curve is higher and frankly it is almost
impossible to find anyone in the market with Tapestry experience) but it
provides a low barrier to exit - if versions are not going to be
compatible and require significant effort, then why not evalulate other
frameworks out there?
- Anyone have experience comparing this with Echo 2? The echo 2 demo on
their website does look impressive.
Your thoughts are appreciated...
KR
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
