I wrote a HiveMind module that allows you to inject HiveMind services/configurations into AspectJ aspects. It works similar to the way Spring does it.
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Zimowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 10:30 AM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Tapestry & AspectJ Can anybody reflect on their experience with combining a large Tap (4) application with AspectJ? I am most interested in advising Tapestry pages but also any other object that I may not have configured explicitly in Hivemind. * By using AspectJ was cross cutting truly easier on your application and team of developers? * Was it easy and practical when dealing with multiple environments (system, readiness, production)? I mean, if you wanted to deploy un-adviced codebase to production, and performance-logging advice to readiness, and method-tracing plus performance-logging advice to system environment? * If you did use AspectJ, did you abandon Hivemind around advice model? Are you using both? * Are you using Spring AOP as well? Any other AOP framework? If so, what drives your motivation to use (or not use) AspectJ ? I am very encouraged by Eclipse IDE support for AspectJ, and it's undesputed power and flexibility it brings to AOP. I've never worked with it however, and am a bit resistant to integrate it without some feedback from Tapestry people who may have gone thru some good and bads with it. Thank You --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
