If I click submit without entering a username and
password, both will be marked by two red asterisks.
Any blank text filed is marked with two asterisks.
I noticed that that in your earlier post,
the .html of the Login component does not have
the form component defined in Login.jwc.
So in my Login.html, I wrap your table by
<span jwcid="form">
Shing
--- Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, when you DONT insert a username and password and
> press submit, he gives
> a warning about the missing values?
>
> On 7/24/06, Shing Hing Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I have tested your Login component (in the case
> > extending BaseComponent and then extending
> > AbstractBaseComponent) and there is no problem
> with
> > the validator.
> >
> > Shing
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I just tried to make my class extend
> BaseComponent
> > > and nothing happened.
> > >
> > > This is the source for the base class I use for
> all
> > > my components. Its
> > > pretty straightforward and since all components
> are
> > > DB aware, I handle all
> > > the db logistics in here. But still, I cannot
> see
> > > how this could fail to
> > > affect my validators.
> > >
> > > public abstract class AbstractBaseComponent
> extends
> > > BaseComponent implements
> > > Serializable {
> > >
> > > protected DataSource ds;
> > > protected Connection conn;
> > > protected PreparedStatement stmt;
> > > protected ResultSet rs;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
@InjectObject("service:Configuration.ConnectionPool")
> > > public abstract DataSource getDataSource();
> > >
> > >
> > > public ResultSet executeQuery(String query){
> > >
> > > try{
> > > ds = getDataSource();
> > > conn = ds.getConnection();
> > >
> > > stmt = conn.prepareStatement(query);
> > >
> > > rs = stmt.executeQuery();
> > >
> > > }catch(Exception e){
> > > println(e.getMessage());
> > > }
> > > return rs;
> > > }
> > >
> > > protected void print(Object msg){
> > > System.err.print(msg.toString());
> > > }
> > >
> > > protected void println(Object msg){
> > > System.err.println(msg.toString());
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > On 7/24/06, Shing Hing Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > To narrow down your problem, you could make
> the
> > > java
> > > > class of your component extends BaseComponent
> > > directly
> > > > (if possible) and
> > > > see whether the validator works.
> > > > Also, it might be a good idea to post the code
> of
> > > your
> > > >
> > > > AbstractBaseComponent (if it is reasonably
> short).
> > > >
> > > > Shing
> > > >
> > > > --- Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I didn't override any methods, although
> calling
> > > > > super could be usefull.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/24/06, Shing Hing Man
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do not know whether the following helps.
> > > > > > In your custom class
> AbstractBaseComponent,
> > > if
> > > > > you
> > > > > > have over ridden any methods of its parent
> > > > > > BaseComponent, please check if you need to
> do
> > > a
> > > > > > super().(overRidden method).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > My component extends
> AbstractBaseComponent.
> > > Its
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > class I created to work as
> > > > > > > a parent for all my components. That way
> I
> > > can
> > > > > use
> > > > > > > inheritance to customize
> > > > > > > my components at will.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AbstractBaseComponent itself extends
> > > > > BaseComponent.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Shing Hing Man
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Oops ! What I said about the missing
> > > delegate
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > rubbish. The validator should work
> without
> > > it.
> > > > > (I
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > tested it.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There should not be any difference
> > > whether a
> > > > > > > > component
> > > > > > > > is defined explicitly (in jwc or
> .page)
> > > or
> > > > > > > implicitly
> > > > > > > > (in .html).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The java class of your component
> extends
> > > > > > > > AbstractComponent.
> > > > > > > > I thought if your component has a html
> > > > > tmeplate,
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > need to extend from BaseComponent.
> > > > > > > > (But then James has said it works for
> > > him.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Shing
> > > > > > > > --- Rui Pacheco
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am looking at another project
> where I
> > > > > defined
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > form inline in the HTML
> > > > > > > > > and it worked without it. I just
> defined
> > > a
> > > > > form
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > <form jwcid="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
> > > > > > > > > and had no problems.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Whats the difference between
> declaring
> > > the
> > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > properties inline and in the
> > > > > > > > > component specification, why does it
> > > work in
> > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > instance and not on the
> > > > > > > > > other?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I know I could put the form
> > > specification in
> > > > > the
>
=== message truncated ===
Home page :
http://uk.geocities.com/matmsh/index.html
___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease
of use." - PC Magazine
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
