I could use some jar's on the site, it makes management happy. If its there, its official. If I download from SVN, its beta and buggy.
On 7/27/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, Spring beans are not real HiveMind services by default. -----Original Message----- From: Payne, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:57 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: RE: Any news on Tap 4.1? Just curious, when this is combined with the spring plugin(tapestry-spring.jar), do components from spring get autowired as well? Thanks, Matt -----Original Message----- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:27 PM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: Any news on Tap 4.1? Components can be autowired too! :-) -----Original Message----- From: Martin Strand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:21 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Any news on Tap 4.1? I just changed to 4.1 in pom.xml and everything still works. :) Nice to see autowiring for page classes. Martin On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:45:20 +0200, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I had intended to release it Wednesday but I found too many places > that needed a lot more documentation so it didn't come to pass. > > Most of the code is about as stable as it can be until we get more > feedback/people using it. I'll probably end up making the "official" > release > Friday, but it won't involve too many code changes so anyone waiting may > as > well start now. > > I'd reccomend using maven2 snapshot builds of it anyway as it is likely > that > I'll continue to make daily/weekly/etc updates to them as bugs are > fixed/features added. > > I can't give it a seal of approval stability wise, but from what I know > of > the tapestry ajax community I'd say this very early alpha release is > probably the most stable/well tested implementation of it you can find. > :) > > Please, do start using it. The release is really a formality at this > point. > > On 7/27/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Didn't someone announce a couple of weeks ago that it would be done "in >> a >> couple of weeks?" >> Thats why I'm asking today, I thought the date would be near. >> >> On 7/27/06, Spencer Crissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > No one who is involved in the voting process can estimate how stable >> the >> > current build is, just approximately, any closer than that? >> > >> > We are in a similar boat, and would love to have just some kind of >> > ballpark >> > guess, like, "all features are in and it is mostly stable - maybe a >> few >> > weeks" vs. "features are present but significant issues are known - >> maybe >> > a >> > couple months" vs. "missing features and many issues - several >> months". >> > >> > >> > >> > On 7/27/06, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > I believe a new model is being used now. 4.1 releases will be made >> and >> > > eventually one will be voted stable. So, I don't think there's any >> > > definite >> > > timeline other than ASAP. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Kevin >> > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > From: Rui Pacheco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:53 AM >> > > > To: Tapestry users; Tapestry users >> > > > Subject: Any news on Tap 4.1? >> > > > >> > > > We've been thinking about redoing some of our internal web apps >> with >> > > Ajax, >> > > > but we decided to wait until Tap4.1 was out. >> > > > Any dates for when that's to happen? >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Cumprimentos, >> > > > Rui Pacheco >> > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Cumprimentos, >> Rui Pacheco >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy or delete the original message. Also, please be aware that if you are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action or reliance based on this message is prohibited by law. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
