Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > Ahhh I see now. > > I think we'll have to come up with a different attribute name for that > case. > Probably something like the familiar <namespace>:<Component Name> syntax? Yea, that was what i had in mind when i suggested <component-specification inherits="TextField">
I feel inherit-specification=true/false is not needed at all > > Either way it will work the same way, once we know who gets what, it's the same thing - i'm pretty sure you got a working prototype as we speak :) > but thank you for bringing it up so I > don't code myself into a corner for this. (other than whatever other > corners > I may end up in, hopefully not eventually ending up mugged or beaten > by java > streat thugs...) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
