Hi, for me is important to divide the part of error checking from the error presentation. Why?? For me is important to present the client and server side error the same way not to be able distinguish these 2 methods.
The server side validation goes directly this way, the validation engine only finds the errors and the presentation is on the developer, with javascript this should be the same. Jirka Dennis Sinelnikov napsal(a): > > Jesse -- I took a look at the links you sent and agree with Alex. > Flexibility is nice to have, +1 for configurable :) > > Thanks, > Dennis > > Norbert Sándor wrote: >> I can't help too much because in my apps I used server side validation >> only, so I don't know how the client side validation currently works. >> But if I would use it, then what I'd like is a very easy way to plug >> in my own solution - which is the exact same copy of what my server >> side implementation does. So my users could see the same visual >> presentation of the error message regardsless of it was generated on >> the client or server side. >> >> Regards: >> Norbi >> >> Jesse Kuhnert írta: >>> If you are using Tapestry 4.1.1 or greater then you have probably run >>> into the new client side validation modal dialog popup: >>> >>> http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/usersguide/clientside-validation.html >>> >>> >>> I've decided that I should probably follow some of my own advice and >>> would like to "fix" this as described here: >>> >>> http://www.humanized.com/weblog/2006/09/11/monolog_boxes_and_transparent_messages/ >>> >>> >>> Ironically I had already created a Dojo widget to do the exact same >>> thing before this blog entry even came out but never really thought to >>> apply the same kind of idea to validation..(this is also the kind of >>> non-intrusive validation that tacos does by default): >>> >>> http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/tests/widget/test_Toaster.html >>> >>> Not sure which release this belongs in but I've got all kinds of >>> usability/humane/etc plans for validation that I'm going to want to >>> try applying at some point. I'd really rather just completely remove >>> this dialog but want to see how people feel about it first. >>> >>> I can always just make this a configurable option where you opt-in and >>> choose which kind of client side validation "theme" you'd like, but >>> I'm not as convinced that more options here will necessarily be >>> helping people. >>> >>> What do you think/feel ? >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jiří Mareš (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) ČSAD SVT Praha, s.r.o. (http://www.svt.cz) Czech Republic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
