Sounds like a potential ognl bug as well. The (index + 1) expression should be interpreted as a separate addition expression from everything else.
If you would be so kind as to file an issue here: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL I can take a look at fixing it during the next release. On 1/24/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thx Richard, In your opinion whats better/smarter: 1) "ognl:id + '-cg-' + (index * 1 + 1)" 2)"ognl:id + '-cg-' + add(index,1)" ? On 1/24/07, Richard Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/24/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "ognl:id + '-cg-' + (index + 1)" > > > > the index is an int property. > > I expect the result to be: > > > > comp-cg-1 > > etc. but instead I've back > > comp-cg-01 > > It's ugly, but one answer is "ognl:id + '-cg-' + (index * 1 + 1)", > using the multiplication to force interpretation as a number. > > ...Richard > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
