+1 from me

On 3/16/07, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I have no problem with Tacos for this, as long as the current developers
of Tacos are ok with opening the doors of svn to many more developers. I
think a restructure of file structure would be needed and some stronger
guidelines would have to be written, but i think it could work.

Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> I mostly just wanted to edit the subject line so we don't keep
> treading all over Jeromes announcement.
>
> I agree...The current site + demo do tend to be ajax driven, but there
> was a glimmer of hope that we'd be able to support more services and
> other things as well...Don't let my opinion sway anyone from starting
> whichever projects they like of course, I'll support all of them
> either way. ;)
>
> Speaking of Tacos, I think it'd be nice if at a minimum Andreas had
> admin support on it finally. What do you say Viktor?
>
> On 3/15/07, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I wouldn't tie tacos to ajax that closely...
>>
>> Renaming tacos-core to tacos-ajax and adding a whole bunch of new
>> modules
>> + a few more devs is certainly a way forward. I guess Viktor can help
>> with
>> the accounts,
>> or perhaps give us access to do that.
>>
>> Tacos already has 4 and 4.1 specific sections. So, why not join?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/16/07, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Jérôme BERNARD wrote:
>> > > On 3/16/07, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >> I've been thinking a little about the fact that Tapestry doesn't
>> really
>> > >> have a place for the general community to use as a home for
>> components,
>> > >> services and Tapestry related stuff that may be useful to others.
>> > >>
>> > >> I think this is why tapestry-contrib was created, but it being
>> under
>> > >> Apache it doesn't really provide the freedom for the general
>> community
>> > >> to join as developers and really get theirs hands dirty.
>> > >> So, i'm thinking something like a new project hosted in
>> sourceforge or
>> > >> javaforge or something like that. The project should be managed
>> by a
>> > >> Tapestry developer. Still, everyone that wanted to contribute,
like
>> > >> Jerome, would be made a developer and would access to svn. I
>> have some
>> > >> ideas on this but before i share them, does this sound stupid ?
>> > >
>> > > No. Sounds fine.
>> > > Maybe create a specific T4, T4.1 and T5 sections though so that
>> users
>> > > can figure out which components they can use.
>> > That's the idea. Special conventions and infrastructure would have
>> to be
>> > built to allow this to work correctly.
>> > >
>> > >> PS - Sorry for stealing the thread....
>> > >
>> > > No problem, after all, even though I can host my work on my own
>> > > servers, an "official" home for this puppy would probably be better
>> > > :-)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Jérôme
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
>> Tapestry / Tacos developer
>> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>>
>
>




--
Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / JEE Consulting

Reply via email to