Infragistics ???? please... samples are so old fashioned, it's a closed/blackbox suicide framework the grid compared to the one I'm finishing (for free) is no more then a toy.
and I don't beleave in JSF. and all this for $1,290.00/$795.00 ????????????????????????????????????? r u serious ;-p ? kiuma On 3/31/07, kranga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We invested in T3 and are sticking with it until JSF matures some more (with Infragistics releasing their component base for JSF, thats a great boost). Clearly the Tapestry developers are in the pursuit of new features/technologies rather than building up a community. Not that there is anything wrong with that, it is just their priority. However, the consequence is reflected in the "niche and esoteric" nature of Tapestry with a glaring lack of widespread use. Tapestry gives you no lock-in and for every upgrade you think of, you are given the opportunity to evaluate any other framework out there :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martino Piccinato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:39 AM Subject: Re: T5 vs T4 vs Community > Well, I know it's not T4 => T5, I was just adding a possible source of bad > perception due to this misconception (and to misnaming...?) > > I think that the fact of not having a stable T4 "ajax ready" release add > confusion to this. A customer thinking that T4 => T5 might think "well > they > are not pushing that much on T4 with ajax because they are already working > on T5, so as I want to work with Ajax why should I work with T4 that will > be > soon outdated and not retrocompatible with T5?". And so on... > > > > > And actually having > > On 3/29/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Martino, >> your comment is because you consider T4=>T5 as the major part of people >> does. >> >> On 3/29/07, Martino Piccinato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I think another bad perception might origin from the fact of having the >> T4 >> > "Ajax ready" 4.1 release still not released as stable after quite a >> > long >> > time and a completely new not retrocompatible T5 appear (the same to >> > me: >> > not >> > critiques, just observations). >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
