Geez those guys are such ass clowns..... I wonder what the average kind of shop is that employs JSF engineers anyways? A factory of internal one off app developers? (not that internal apps are bad)
Searching on dice.com shows lots of "eh" employers for JSF while under Tapestry I see fun looking names like E*Trade/eBay/zillow/Expedia/etc.... It's not always important to be the most popular, just being the best is fine by me. On 9/7/07, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you take a closer look at the comments you'll see that JSF isn't all > that hot after all, and the way the author came up with the numbers is > questionable at best, so there's really nothing to see here. > > -Filip > > kranga skrev: > > http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html > > > > Tapestry, despite being a strong competitor to JSF, has gone virtually > > no where. once it is experienced its initial growth spurt after being > > released. It's basically flat. Unlike the Ruby on Rails vs. Spring data, > > the data at dice.com seems to support this one. There are currently only > > 87 jobs listed for Tapestry. This part is hard to debate no matter how > > you spin the numbers. Tapestry is virtually flat as far as having any > > kind of growth. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
