There was a project which suffered, and that was spindle.
One of the big reasons Geoff gave up trying to add support for T4 to
spindle was due to the template/class mismatch.
Robert
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10/302:31 PM , Kevin Menard wrote:
That's unfortunate. In T4 you could map multiple templates to a
single
class or have no class at all. It was quite nice and I'm unaware
of any
projects that suffered as a result.
To me, being a Web application framework, the class should
complement the
page, providing the server side logic as necessary. If not
necessary, you
shouldn't need to have empty artifacts kicking around.
C'est la vie, I suppose.
--
Kevin
On 10/27/07 11:36 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
planning.co.jp, "Nick
Westgate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No. The class defines the page. This is implicit in the design.
The alternatives are a slippery slope to configuration complexity.
Cheers,
Nick.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
