The premature optimization was thinking that resolving dependencies once, and storing them in instance variables, was going to be appreciably faster than using static methods.
Actually, the real savings was in terms of typing those same parameters and annotations ... and that's gone away with the Guice-inspired ServiceBinder and other improvements. On Feb 6, 2008 12:40 PM, Hilco Wijbenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 11:32 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > except for bind() which is static. > > Bummer! :-) > > > Just part of the strategy for deferring, or avoiding, instantiation of > > the module class. > > > > In retrospect, premature optimization. If I were starting that from > > scratch, all the methods on a module class would be static. > > I don't understand. If you say (and I would agree) that using static > is premature optimisation then why would you still want to make all > methods in a module static? With instance methods testing is much > easier. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
