binder.bind(MyRequestExceptionHandler.class);

On Feb 18, 2008 12:00 PM, Geoff Callender
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response, but no joy.  Now it fails when the
> first page is requested because now there are 2 implementations of the
> one service.
>
> 21:55:24,145 ERROR [RequestHandler] Construction of service
> RequestHandler failed: Error invoking service builder method
> org.apache.tapestry.services.TapestryModule.build(Logger, List,
> Dispatcher) (at TapestryModule.java:905) (for service
> 'RequestHandler'): Error invoking service contribution method
> org
> .apache
> .tapestry
> .services
> .TapestryModule.contributeRequestHandler(OrderedConfiguration,
> Context, RequestExceptionHandler, long, long, LocalizationSetter):
> Service interface org.apache.tapestry.services.RequestExceptionHandler
> is matched by 2 services: MyRequestExceptionHandler,
> RequestExceptionHandler.  Automatic dependency resolution requires
> that exactly one service implement the interface.
>
>
>
>
> On 18/02/2008, at 9:51 PM, Davor Hrg wrote:
>
> > binder.bind(RequestExceptionHandler.class,
> > MyRequestExceptionHandler.class).withId("MyRequestExceptionHandler");
> >
> > On Feb 18, 2008 11:42 AM, Geoff Callender
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I can't find the right way to configure AppModule.  Latest attempt is
> >> simply to do this:
> >>
> >>        public static void bind(ServiceBinder binder) {
> >>                binder.bind(RequestExceptionHandler.class,
> >> MyRequestExceptionHandler.class);
> >>        }
> >>
> >> but it seems that's not legal.  Stacktrace snippet is:
> >>
> >> 21:12:45,403 ERROR [[/jumpstart]] Exception starting filter app
> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: Service id 'RequestExceptionHandler' has
> >> already been defined by
> >> org
> >> .apache
> >> .tapestry
> >> .internal.services.DefaultRequestExceptionHandler(RequestPageCache,
> >> PageResponseRenderer, Logger) (at
> >> DefaultRequestExceptionHandler.java:
> >> 37) and may not be redefined by 
> >> jumpstart.web.services.MyRequestExceptionHandler
> >> (RequestPageCache, PageResponseRenderer, Logger) (at
> >> MyRequestExceptionHandler.java:43). You should rename one of the
> >> service builder methods.
> >>        at
> >> org
> >> .apache.tapestry.ioc.internal.RegistryImpl.<init>(RegistryImpl.java:
> >> 174)
> >>
> >> Geoff
> >>
> >>
> >> On 18/02/2008, at 2:00 AM, Davor Hrg wrote:
> >>
> >>> yes :)
> >>>
> >>> either that,
> >>> or pass the value to your ExceptionReporter
> >>> and have customized page for both dev and production :)
> >>>
> >>> Davor Hrg
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 17, 2008 2:49 PM, Geoff Callender
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> So you're suggesting that I test the value of the system property
> >>>> tapestry.production-mode in AppModule and use it to condition
> >>>> whether
> >>>> I contribute an ExceptionReporter.  Is that right?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 17/02/2008, at 11:49 PM, Davor Hrg wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> you can use that symbol in your custom erro page too,
> >>>>> either omit the contribution,
> >>>>> or display different message
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Feb 17, 2008 1:25 PM, Geoff Callender
> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>> Is there a way to make it use your own custom exception report
> >>>>>> page
> >>>>>> only if -Dtapestry.production-mode=true?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 17/02/2008, at 10:47 PM, Geoff Callender wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I like it - I think it's the right default.  Just need to make
> >>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>> everyone's aware of it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Geoff
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 17/02/2008, at 9:58 PM, Davor Hrg wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> it's exactly that
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2008 11:20 AM, Chris Poulsen
> >>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Could this be related to the introduction of production mode ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I had to add:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>                 <systemProperties>
> >>>>>>>>>                     <systemProperty>
> >>>>>>>>>                         <name>tapestry.production-mode</name>
> >>>>>>>>>                         <value>false</value>
> >>>>>>>>>                     </systemProperty>
> >>>>>>>>>                 </systemProperties>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Into the maven-jetty-plugin configuration to get the nice
> >>>>>>>>> exception page
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> HTH
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Chris
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Joost Schouten (ml) wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm experiencing the same with 5.0.11
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>> Joost
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Geoff Callender wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Is anyone else seeing this?  The exception report page in
> >>>>>>>>>>> T5.0.10 has
> >>>>>>>>>>> no detail - I'm getting only a heading and the exception,
> >>>>>>>>>>> eg.
> >>>>>>>>>>> An unexpected application exception has occurred.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Render queue error in BeginRender[examples/jodatime/
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1:pagelink]:
> >>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: caught an exception while
> >>>>>>>>>>> obtaining
> >>>>>>>>>>> a class file for jumpstart.web.components.DateMidnightField
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Geoff
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-
> >>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to