yes, that was the only point I would moan about ;)
I once analyzed the package layout (from 5.0.18):
http://aldana-online.de/screenshots/packageOverview.png
You mean with 'left the barn', that you are package refactoring for 5.1.0?
Howard Lewis Ship schrieb:
Thanks. Having your dirty laundry out for all to see is very motivating.
To be honest, one area of T5 that isn't so stirling is package layout,
but that horse has left the barn.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Onno Scheffers <o...@piraya.nl> wrote:
Wow, this looks very good.
My compliments to the Howard and the rest of the team. Every time I look an
the Tapestry source code for something, I am impressed by how clean the code
looks.
Many commercial projects could learn a thing or two from Tapestry :o)
regards,
Onno
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:35 PM, manuel aldana <ald...@gmx.de> wrote:
This confirms my gut feelings that tapestry framework itself is not only
good but also its codebase :)
http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.apache.tapestry:tapestry-project
--
manuel aldana
ald...@gmx.de
software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
manuel aldana
ald...@gmx.de
software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
