Ok, I'll bite :) http://www.jroller.com/WarnerOnstine/entry/tapestry_future_adoption_redux
<q> One shining point came from Howard himself -- "Further, the design of Tapestry 5 was created specifically to make it possible to continue adding features without breaking backwards compatibility going forward. There will not need to be a Tapestry 6." </q> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:35:44 -0300, Luther Baker <lutherba...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > > Yes. >> >> Maybe Tapestry 6 :) >> > > "Tapestry 6" has a history of controversy and trolling. As it's already > 23:38 PM here in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil and I'm lazy now, read this list > and search the web for "tapestry 6" to know what I'm talking about . . . ;) > > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor > http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
