> Many Java web frameworks don't deliver any client-side or ajax features, and > don't tie themselves to a client-side framework as a result. This much is true, but realistically people more than ever want richer applications. IMHO its a good thing for Tapestry to provide some of the basics and a point of entry to be able to extend the core.
Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoffrey Wiseman" <geoffrey.wise...@gmail.com> To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org> Sent: Tuesday, 16 June, 2009 17:34:50 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest, Istanbul Subject: Re: Switch from Prototype to jQuery? On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Ivano Luberti <lube...@archicoop.it> wrote: > Maybe I have lost something, but is there any other framework that > provide this kind of abstraction ? > And if yes to what degree ? > I mean: is there a Java Web Framerok that allow to chose (for example) > if client validation must be done using jquery function or prototype or > whatever ? > Many Java web frameworks don't deliver any client-side or ajax features, and don't tie themselves to a client-side framework as a result. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman http://www.geoffreywiseman.ca/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
