On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo<thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:57:09 -0300, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > escreveu: > Take a look at http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.1/guide/templates.html, > section "Tapestry Elements".
I had seen that section before, but it wasn't really clear (to me, anyway -- a T5.1 newbie who has also used T4) that it was really different. >> and should t:body also support invisible instrumentation, too? > > Using t:type for both components and Tapestry-specific tags (<t:body>, etc) > would cause a lot of confusion and would require some level rewriting of the > template parser. Even using other attribute would require this rewriting, so > I don't know if it's worth the hassle. It may not be worth the hassle, but given that t:body (not a component) looks pretty much like t:if, t:form, t:loop, t:textfield, etc. (components), I think it is a bit confusing. It looks like a duck (component), but doesn't quack. Also, Body was a real component in T4, so that might add to the confusion for anyone moving on to T5. Thanks again Thiago! mrg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
