Jack, what "Uber component pattern" stands for ? Jack Nuzbit ha scritto: > I'm concerned I may be falling foul of the Uber-component pattern as well. > I'm regularly building container components that dynamically render > different sub-components. > Is there any chance somebody could document the recommended approach here. > > Many thanks, > > Jack > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Dave Greggory <davegregg...@yahoo.com>wrote: > > >> NYC. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> >> To: Tapestry users <users@tapestry.apache.org> >> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:11:57 PM >> Subject: Re: [T5.0.18] Out of Memory Error / Potential Leak (doesn't reduce >> after forced GC) >> >> Although upgrading is a good idea for many reasons, I don't think it will >> solve your problem. You need a little re-architecting of your approach to >> get the component instance count back under control. Where are you located? >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Dave Greggory <davegregg...@yahoo.com >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> >> > >
-- ================================================== dott. Ivano Mario Luberti Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l. Sede Operativa Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa tel.: +39-050- 580959 tel/fax: +39-050-9711344 web: www.archicoop.it ================================================== --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
