Hi Christophe, thanks for answering my question! I think that I'm needing something more powerful than that, because I'd need to process the complete component tree in one single step in a single place in the code.
I know, my requirement is kind of weird, but I think the reason is good. Regards! Christophe Cordenier wrote: > > Hi > > Actually, ComponentResources gives you access to the ComponentModel. > Simply > inject ComponentResources and you will get access to the model. > > > 2010/7/6 Juan Isern <[email protected]> > >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I was wondering: is there any good way to get the component model of a >> page? >> (more precisely, the parent-child structure of components, their names >> and >> some properties marked with an annotation, if possible) >> >> I read somewhere in the forum that such information wasn't meant to be >> directly accessed, but I think my reason is rather compelling... >> >> Thanks and regards >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Page-component-tree-model-tp29090350p29090350.html >> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Christophe Cordenier. > > Committer on Apache Tapestry 5 > Co-creator of wooki @wookicentral.com > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Page-component-tree-model-tp29090350p29100021.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
