Actually I had already read the article. But then this argument is not applicable to security alone...
what we generally do is take the generalizations together and create a module... right ? taha On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:45:11 -0200, Taha Hafeez <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, >> > > Hi! > > Just curious (It may end up as a foolish question!) .... why don't we have >> a tapestry-security module which is generic and can have plugins like shino >> or spring-security or a simple role based model.... ? >> > > Not a foolish question at all. It was even asked before in this list. :) > > Short answer: there's no single model that covers all the situations. > Long answer: read this discussion: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-Central-Securing-Tapestry-pages-with-Annotations-Part-1-td2400516.html#a2400534 > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, > and instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
